Lima Memorial Health Systems Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
341694632
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Lima, OH, USA
Phone
4192283335
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$188,382
Expenses
$189,094
Assets
$54,893
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACKIE BINKLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • TAMI HURLEY (PRESIDENT ELECT)

People named in this filing

  • JACKIE BINKLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • TAMI HURLEY (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • MINDI WELLS (RECORDING SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The nbsp; auxiliary nbsp; is nbsp; supported nbsp; by nbsp; members nbsp; who nbsp; pay nbsp; dues nbsp; and nbsp; hold nbsp; events nbsp; and nbsp; sales nbsp; during nbsp; the nbsp; year nbsp; in nbsp; order nbsp; to nbsp; complete nbsp; the nbsp; pledge nbsp; made nbsp; by nbsp; the nbsp; auxiliary nbsp; they nbsp; also nbsp; give nbsp; scholarships nbsp; to nbsp; student nbsp; who nbsp; want nbsp; to nbsp; enter nbsp; the nbsp; medical nbsp; field

What it reported doing in 2025

2025 ways and means had income of 62294 and their expenses were 28595. They awarded scholarships to students looking to advance their education in healthcare. Scholarships awarded were gabriel hile 2000 to rhodes state - olivia meyer 2000 to Ohio state - jaleena howard usd 500 to university of cincinnati - addlyn allen usd 500 to defiance college - laney hedrick 2000 to rhodes state college - marilyn russell 2000 to Ohio state university

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 91% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 273 of 273 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 12 of 13 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.