Lilley Cares
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 301221662
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Fruitport, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2312153853
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,548
- Expenses
- $71,691
- Assets
- $3,201,656
- Liabilities
- $1,878
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIM VAN KAMPEN (PRESIDENT)
- PATRICK ROGGENBAU (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DENISE KURDZIEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- KIM VAN KAMPEN (PRESIDENT)
- KATHERINE MOLINARI (TREASURER)
- PATRICK ROGGENBAU (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Since its inception, lilley cares' historic purpose has been to serve the spring lake community and its local non-profit organizations through the initiation and support of local events, festivals, and beautification efforts. Just as the lilley mansion has inspired us as a symbol of a both historic and reborn spring lake, lilley cares moves forward to a new phase of its mission made possible by the gift of the beautiful hampton green farm. Lilley cares has accepted this gift with the vision of a unique event and retreat venue serving nonprofits and the community alike. Lilley cares' stewardship of hampton green farm will mean we can partner more dynamically with charities, educational organizations, service organizations, and local business to work toward making spring lake and the surrounding communities a better place to live, work, and raise the next generation of citizens and philanthropists.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our signature event is sparkle and we focused entirely on this program in 2023. Our goal is to raise funds to bring the holiday kick off event to downtown spring lake, then host holiday related events throughout the month of december.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.4%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 44.66; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 74% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 36.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 79.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $71K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.