Lift Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 522168409
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2022891151
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Employment Procurement Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,169,950
- Expenses
- $10,159,935
- Assets
- $26,948,573
- Liabilities
- $2,214,077
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE RHONE-COLLINS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- NEILS RIBEIRO-YEMOFIO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - DC)
- SARAH SPUNT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - CHI)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHELLE RHONE-COLLINS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $333,712 total reported compensation
- GABRIEL SCHECK (CHIEF ADVANCEMENT OFFICER): $254,443 total reported compensation
- REBECCA ROSS (CHIEF OPER. AND FIN. OFFICER): $254,377 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Lift's mission is to break the cycle of poverty by investing in parents. We build families' well-being, financial strength, and social connections to lift two generations at once.
What it reported doing in 2024
Founded in 1998, lift, inc is a national nonprofit on a mission to break the cycle of poverty by investing in parents. Decades of inequity and underinvestment in communities have kept low-income families trapped in a cycle that, like wealth, is passed down from generation to generation. All families deserve a better future - no matter their race, ethnicity, or zip code. Lift builds families' well-being, financial strength, and social connections to lift two generations at once - an investment of hope, money, and love. Rooted in a relationship filled with dignity and trust, lift's one-on-one coaching program empowers parents to set and achieve goals - such as going back to school, improving credit, eliminating debt, or securing a living wage that put their families on the path to (continued on schedule o)economic mobility. As part of its investment in families, in 2018, lift launched the family goal fund which provides direct, unrestricted cash to families. Lift reduces stress and increases financial slack by giving cash directly to parents so that they don't have to choose between their emergency needs and long-term goals. As parents persist through lift's two-year program, they receive a total of $1,200, distributed in three-month intervals to stay on track to reach their goals. Lift believes that parents know their families' needs better than any program could, and their evidence shows that parents use these funds to reinvest in themselves, their families, and their goals. Lift's direct service coaching model operating in chicago, los angeles, New York, and Washington d.c. Changes lives. And, now through new, successful capacity-building partnerships and advocacy efforts, we are poised to shift how social service and other systems function for the millions of families living in poverty nationwide. Our systems change goals stem from the humanity that underpins our direct service model as the foundation from where we generate our learning, insights, best practice, and responsive innovations like giving cash. Lift uses impact data alongside parent voice and experience to mitigate, and ultimately change, the actions of systems and policies that drain hope, harm communities, and limit access and success. At federal, state, and city levels, our goals include changing practice, systems, and policies that build financial and social capital for families. Lift's strategic plan builds on our direct service to achieve population-level impact through 1) strategic partnerships that effectively shift public sector practice to better support parent's economic mobility, and 2) advocacy work to shift narratives, educate policymakers, and promote policies that reduce poverty.lift has service sites in chicago, los angeles, New York city, and Washington d.c., and partners with health systems, colleges, early childhood providers, and local and national governments to adopt its approach across the country. Learn more at whywelift.org
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.2%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 78.7%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.3%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.65; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.2% of revenue deployed · 78.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $334K · 23 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $579K reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.