LifeHouse of Houston Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
760226503
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Phone
7136232120
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,007,648
Expenses
$1,442,927
Assets
$7,065,804
Liabilities
$2,214,351

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Claire Hao (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Claire Hao (Executive Director): $122,159 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

What it reported doing in 2024

See Schedule OAfter faithfully serving and ministering for 35 years in the Hobby Airport area, LifeHouse concluded the area was no longer able to meet best the needs of the women and children it serves. In 2023, the ministry relocated from the Hobby Airport area into the heart of the city - the Spring Branch area. As the dynamics of the city and the needs of the women the ministry serves changed, it became clear that the traditional model of service no longer prepared the women in LifeHouse's care for sustainable, independent success. The old campus location was far from many of Houston's best resources and opportunities. Over time, this distance from the city brought about several challenges, including a lack of public transportation (on which many LifeHouse residents rely), job scarcity, inadequate school zoning, limited volunteer and church engagement, and a lack of community for residents and house parents alike. It became clear to the board and staff that a change needed to be made to foster long-term success. LifeHouse believes that, to break the generational cycles that keep families in poverty and relational deserts, the ministry needed to begin to provide accessibility to the resources of Houston. In preparation for the move and subsequent program changes, the ministry chose not to accept new women for a season to ensure stability for anyone entering the program. The last two residents of the former programming graduated in February 2024, the new 26-unit apartment complex was purchased in June, and LifeHouse reopened its doors in September, admitting its first cohort of 4 women, planning to grow by cohort quarterly until it reaches its maximum capacity. This move will increase residential capacity by more than 150% over the next 2 years as beds for women will be doubled, and the ministry will add the ability to take a woman's other children in as well (something that the former property did not allow). LifeHouse of Houston is a residential program for pregnant women and their additional children and is broken into two phases. Phase one is the maternity phase, which can be up to 10 months of care and includes a woman's prenatal months as well as three months of post-partum care. During this phase, women attend classes consisting of Bible Study, Parenting, Newborn Care, Pre/Postnatal, Nutrition, and Safe-Stretch for pregnant moms. They also participate in weekly counseling and case management meetings and are provided supplemental food and clothing provisions. In phase two of the programming, residents enter into the Family Life Program, which can last up to a year. In this phase, they can choose between a career or an education track (30 hours a week). Additionally, they attend Bible Study, Workforce Development classes, and Personal Development classes. They also continue in weekly counseling and bi-weekly case management and goal-setting meetings.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 33.5%; rating input score 34
  • Program expense ratio: 63.5%; rating input score 64
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 52%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.9; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 33.5% of revenue deployed · 63.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $916K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $122K · 11 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $145K reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.