Life Way Team Ministry

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841974855
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Gilroy, CA, USA
Phone
4086615611
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$27,893
Expenses
$10,500
Assets
$17,393

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dale Rimando (President)
  • Abraham Devera (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Dale Rimando (President)
  • Abraham Devera (Vice President)
  • Maria Beronilla (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

LifeWay Team Ministry quest is to reach out with the love of God and the provision as they come to help reach the homeless with hope, prayer, encouragement, meals and a new direction in life. This has been done through personal and public donation and volunteer help. We work with local churches and local helpful facilities that will help work with our goals to make a difference in our cities and communities and abroad. Our goal is through the love God to create a movement within our larger cities to create ways not only to reach homelessness and to help the needy get a new direction within building relationships through local churches and outreaches to slowly bring change and even create possibly further none profit programs such as in Las Angeles the Dream Center. Dream Center has made such an impact to turn people

What it reported doing in 2025

Lifeway Team Ministry quest is to reach out with the love of God and provision as they come to help reach the homeless with hope, prayer, encouragement, meals and a new direction in life.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 62.4%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.