Life Recaptured Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832920883
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Merritt Island, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8663215515
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $413,096
- Expenses
- $417,242
- Assets
- $55,900
- Liabilities
- $48,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jennifer Snyder (Vice-President)
- Katherine Crisafulli (President/Founder)
Highest reported compensation
- Jennifer Snyder (Vice-President): $35,307 total reported compensation
- Katherine Crisafulli (President/Founder): $3,805 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of our organization is to provide a full curriculum of services to its reclaimed victims of human trafficking including: advocacy/legal services, intake and assessment of need, crisis intervention, counseling, mental and physical health (STD/STI) screening and treatment, alcohol, substance abuse, suicide prevention, life skills and vocational training, the arts, spiritual growth and, eventually, repatriation/reintegration into society. We also provide awareness and prevention training to the community and professionals, such as law enforcement, firefighters and medical personnel.
What it reported doing in 2025
Life Recaptured provides activities and training to the community. Here trainees, school students, health professionals and law enforcement personnel will receive the best and most up-to-date information in this ever-changing criminal industry. Our leaders have 30+ years of combined training in human trafficking, awareness and prevention. Learn the signs of human trafficking. Recognizing these combined signs will help individuals accurately alert local or federal authorities of a possible situation. For a victim of trafficking, this may save a life.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 31
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.86; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.4%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -28.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $417K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $35K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.