Life of the Village Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
921818016
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Kalispell, MT, USA
Phone
4062911963
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$26
Expenses
$16,747
Assets
$73,312
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FRANCISCO MANZO-GONZALES (PRESIDENT, TREASURER, DIRE)
  • AMY BERNT (VICE PRESIDENT, SECRETARY,)

People named in this filing

  • MARIA GAYTAN-GONZALES (DIRECTOR)
  • FRANCISCO MANZO-GONZALES (PRESIDENT, TREASURER, DIRE)
  • AMY BERNT (VICE PRESIDENT, SECRETARY,)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Food, shelter, medical to underserved

What it reported doing in 2024

Giving to the needs of the communities we are a part of (whether long-term or short-term). These needs are the ones we are made aware of in our daily experiences. Examples are caring for the elderly, orphans, single parents, help cases of domestic violence, paying for addiction recovery care and other medical care, repairing streets and homes, cleaning the village, etc. During 2024, the nonprofit was able to provide the funds for medical treatments, safety improvements, groceries, funeral expenses and assistance to widows and orphans, household needs, and medicine to families in mexico.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 45% for direct work, and 55% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 82.5%; rating input score 83

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -64,311.5%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.38; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 136.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -199.9% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -20.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 82.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.