Life Net of Missoula

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810485750
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Missoula, MT, USA
Phone
4065490406
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$341,055
Expenses
$340,883
Assets
$300,974
Liabilities
$10,075

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFIER BARTLETT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ROGER HANCOCK (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • NATE MARTIN (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNIFIER BARTLETT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $54,600 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Life nbsp; net nbsp; of nbsp; missoula nbsp; is nbsp; an nbsp; organization nbsp; that nbsp; believes nbsp; that nbsp; every nbsp; person nbsp; is nbsp; created nbsp; in nbsp; the nbsp; image nbsp; of nbsp; god nbsp; and nbsp; therefore nbsp; worthy nbsp; of nbsp; receiving nbsp; love nbsp; support nbsp; and nbsp; care nbsp; as nbsp; such nbsp; we nbsp; are nbsp; committed nbsp; to nbsp; providing nbsp; information nbsp; physical nbsp; and nbsp; emotional nbsp; support nbsp; and nbsp; assistance nbsp; to nbsp; anyone nbsp; experiencing nbsp; an nbsp; expected nbsp; pregnancy nbsp; or nbsp; sexual nbsp; health nbsp; issue

What it reported doing in 2024

Support and assistance provided to anyone experiencing an unexpected pregnancy. We are also committed to supporting these women and their families beyond the pregnancy through education and material support. We provide this assistance free-of-charge to anyone who is in need regardless of personal history or religious beliefs. Our organization strives to maintain the highest standards of professionalism in every aspect of operation. We provide non-judgmental compassionate care with the utmost level of confidentiality.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.5%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 66.1%; rating input score 66
  • Fundraising efficiency: $18.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.5% of revenue deployed · 66.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $225K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G event receipts did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.