LIFE MATTERS JOURNAL INC Rehumanize International

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455151491
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Phone
8176818611
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Human Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,740
Expenses
$134,363
Assets
$30,779
Liabilities
$2,786

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sean Champagne (Executive Director)
  • Beth Fox (Board President)
  • Emiliano Vera (Board Vice President)
  • Reynaldo Guevara (Board Vice President)
  • Rebecca Pope (Interim Executive Director (May-June))

People named in this filing

  • Sean Champagne (Executive Director)
  • Beth Fox (Board President)
  • Rebecca Pope (Board Treasurer Until End of April)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Human Rights Advocacy

What it reported doing in 2024

During fiscal year 2024-2025, Rehumanize International team members conducted outreach activities including: participating in the Pax Christi Caravan over Unlawful Detention in Louisiana; participating in the Vigil to Abolish the Death Penalty at the U.S. Supreme Court; attending the Celebrate Life Conference and rally in Washington, DC; speaking at the Mississippi Life Summit; joining the No Kings March in Georgia supporting immigrants' rights; maintaining active engagement across Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and other social media platforms; and supporting grassroots network development

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 44.1%; rating input score 44
  • Program expense ratio: 39.7%; rating input score 40

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 44.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 44.1% of revenue deployed · 39.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $53K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.