Quest, Inc.

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592013160
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
407.218.4300
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Developmentally Disabled Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,460,713
Expenses
$39,000,247
Assets
$44,227,626
Liabilities
$18,956,583

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

26 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN GILL (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • BENITO ARAGON (VICE PRESIDENT OF MARKETING)
  • ELYSCHA HARRIS (VICE PRESIDENT AND CLINIAL DIRECTOR)
  • LAUREN NELSON (VICE PRESIDENT OF PHILANTHROPY)
  • SCOTT BARNETTE (VICE PRESIDENT OF RESIDENTIAL)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOHN GILL (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $373,686 total reported compensation
  • BROOKE EAKINS (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $215,602 total reported compensation
  • TODD THRASHER (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $211,627 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To transform the lives of individuals with developmental disabilities in Central Florida through quality and innovation.

What it reported doing in 2024

Quest residential services offers housing options in the orlando and tampa areas with services appropriate to the needs and abilities of each resident. This includes intermediate care facilities, group homes, transitional and supported living, and independent living. Quest residential services provided homes for 197 adults with developmental disabilities in fiscal year 2025. A personal development plan is prepared for every individual who is in the residential program. Those plans identify each person's unique abilities, goals and interests. Quest works in tandem with residents, their families, and medical providers to coordinate needed health services. A nurse visits residents on-site and monitors their health, and all staff members are trained in first aid and cpr. Intermediate care facilities (icfs): icfs offer a nurturing home environment for individuals with profound developmental disabilities who are non-ambulatory. Quest icf programs offer 24-hour skilled nursing care, physical, speech and occupational therapy, and an extensive support system in comfortable and customized residences that meet the needs of the individuals quest serves. Group homes: individuals live in small groups of 8-12 people where increasing independence through continued skill training is emphasized. Residents have the option to participate in activities that promote lifelong education, a healthy lifestyle, and allow them to assume personal and community responsibility. Transitional and supported living: these residences are designed to fulfill the wishes of caring parents and guardians by offering a life rich in experiences and opportunities for individuals with developmental disabilities. Individuals enjoy apartment living with roommates while receiving daily support services that foster independence. Individuals live and work independently in the community and are assisted as needed with more complex tasks such as banking and navigating public transportation. Independent living: quest village is an innovative residential community located in east orlando and designed for independent adults with developmental disabilities with convenient access to employment, healthcare, transportation, entertainment, and education. The community is comprised of 48-single bedroom/single bath apartments that provide safety and comfort. On- and off-site support services are available to assist individuals with activities of daily living. Residents are offered a variety of ongoing social activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 92
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.2%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 82.2%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.81 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 12 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 88.2% of revenue deployed · 82.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $32.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $374K · 26 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.