Life Center of Page Valley
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541466867
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Luray, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5407431464
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $58,550
- Expenses
- $46,598
- Assets
- $122,410
- Liabilities
- $177
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Amber Conway (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR January - December)
- David Morton (PRESIDENT)
- Beth Ancell (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- Amber Conway (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR January - December)
- David Morton (PRESIDENT)
- Beth Ancell (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Life Center of Page Valley provides material assistance to women in crisis pregnancy, and to women and families with infants and small children. We service between 120 and 150 clients annually. Our material assistance includes diapers, training pants, baby wipes, and infant formula and non-medical counseling and family assistance.
What it reported doing in 2024
We provide direct material assistance to women in crisis pregnancy and women and families with infant and young children in need of help. Our assistance in 2024 included: Baby Food $9.40, Baby Gate $14.98, Wipes 338.12, Diapers $290.80, Formula $289.44. Literature $25, Other Material Support such as Genie Refills, Back Seat Mirror $74.10, pregnancy test $49.95 and Training Pants $1,340.28.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 4
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.2%; rating input score 4
- Program expense ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 5
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.4%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.63; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 58.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.2% of revenue deployed · 5.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.