Licking County Center for the Visually Impaired Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311081258
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Newark, OH, USA
Phone
7403450821
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Employment Procurement Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$153,048
Expenses
$264,618
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

People named in this filing

  • THOMAS B YOUNG (Executive Dir.)
  • DAVID MARTIN (Chairman)
  • JAMES D MCNUTT (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Facilitate access by visually impaired citizens of Licking County in financial need to the services of local eyecare professionals and to provide financial assistance to pay for those services and corrective vision products and equipment as needed.

What it reported doing in 2020

Arranged appointments for aproximately 298 qualified licking county residents with local eyecare professionals and provided financial assistance to pay for eyecare exams and corrective vision products.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 19
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 4
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 21.8%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 12.6%; rating input score 13

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -72.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.9%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -29.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 21.8% of revenue deployed · 12.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2012 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.