Liberty Street Csa Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931404308
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Rockville Centre, NY, USA
Phone
5165990888
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$166
Expenses
$27
Assets
$139

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JONATHAN FALCON (Director)
  • KENNETH FALCON (Director)
  • REBECCA MORALES FALCON (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Liberty Street CSA is a community supported agriculture organization intending toprimarily operate in Newburgh, New York serving the local community for charitableand educational purposes. Liberty Street CSA will partner with local farmers and the local community to provide low-cost, healthy, organic, produce to its members thereby reducing food waste and improving the access of its members, and their broader community, to healthy, organic, produce in a food desert where such options are not readily available. Liberty Street CSA also intends for a substantial portion of membership fees, and donations, to be used to provide subsidized and free healthy, organic, produce to non-member persons in the local community who have financial need. Liberty Street CSA will also coordinate with local farmers and businesses to organize community events for the promotion of healthy eating and related education about the benefits of a diet including healthy, organic, local, produce.

What it reported doing in 2023

Produce sales

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 16.8%; rating input score 17
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 83.7%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.15; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 16.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $27 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.