Liberty Steam Fire Engine Co No 1
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 230807653
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015
- Location
- Spring City, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6109486510
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fire Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $490,217
- Expenses
- $297,814
- Assets
- $618,884
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM GUFFEY (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES VELARIO (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JAMES VELARIO (VICE PRESIDENT): $3,450 total reported compensation
- EARL SCHLICHTER (RECORDING SECRETARY): $3,350 total reported compensation
- ROGER SCHMIDT (TRUSTEE (NON-VOTING)): $250 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Preserve property and save lives by providing fire prevention and rescue services to the community of spring city Pennsylvania and surrounding communities
What it reported doing in 2015
To provide the borough of spring city and surrounding communities with fire prevention and rescue services
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 76% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 80% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 11
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 38
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 12.6%; rating input score 13
- Program expense ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 12
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 93.2%; rating input score 93; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.2%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.08; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -57.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -16.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 12.6% of revenue deployed · 12.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $36K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 13/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.