Liberty House

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931236936
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Salem, OR, USA
Phone
5035400288
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,465,710
Expenses
$6,187,908
Assets
$4,813,231
Liabilities
$1,408,109

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

32 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALISON KELLEY (CEO)
  • BRUCE ANDERSON (DEPUTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFF)

Highest reported compensation

  • KALIQ WILLIAMS (MEDICAL DIRECTOR (UNTIL 4/2025)): $291,976 total reported compensation
  • JUNE LEE (MEDICAL PROVIDER): $268,733 total reported compensation
  • ALISON KELLEY (CEO): $246,470 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Excellence in the assessment, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, neglect, trauma and grief in order to promote health and hope in children, youth, families and communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Liberty house is the only children's advocacy center serving marion and polk counties. During the fiscal year ended june 30, 2025, liberty house provided 805 medical exams and 618 forensic interviews for children with concerns of abuse and /or neglect. Furthermore, liberty house performed reviews of case files and photographs of 143 children taken pursuant to karly's law, an Oregon statute which requires photographs to be taken of any child with suspicious injuries discovered during a child abuse investigation.liberty house's hope and wellness program provided trauma-informed counseling to 83 clients. The therapists provided a total of 1,399 individual therapy sessions, 158 family therapy sessions, and 62 mental health assessments. The program also added a new therapist to increase our program capacity. Liberty house provided child abuse prevention education to 1,082 people. Additionally, liberty house commissioned a professional, academic program evaluation of its myworth curriculum, which our staff developed in response to stakeholder requests for ways to empower school-aged students to protect themselves online and via their social media engagement. A team of experienced phd social researchers from the university of Oregon center for childhood safety & wellbeing studied the curriculum and its delivery and determined it was effective and had fidelity to its stated goals.the most notable achievement was that in january 2025 liberty house was notified that we had earned national accreditation by the national children's alliance (www.nationalchildrensalliance.org) the professional organization that oversees over 960 children's advocacy centers throughout the united states. Liberty house worked for several years to attain the level of excellence necessary for this distinction and during the site visit in october 2024, we were told that we were in the top 1% of cacs nationwide in terms of our performance. This was a major highlight.during the fiscal year liberty house saw the departure of some employees who left for various reasons. Liberty house noticed a slowing of clinical referrals during the first 6 months of the fiscal year and convened a committee of board, staff and community members to address the trend. Referrals picked up noticeably during the second 6 months of the fiscal year and have remained strong. Liberty house leadership made strategic decisions to reduce administrative overhead costs by not filling certain positions in order to reduce loss and maximize fiscal stability. Liberty house continues to benefit from the confidence of its primary philanthropic supporters. Longevity in senior staff remains strong.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.9%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -13.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.9% of revenue deployed · 80.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $292K · 32 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.