Liberty Hill Lacrosse Team
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920393545
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Liberty Hill, TX, USA
- Phone
- 3074215849
- Rating
- 46
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $147,979
- Expenses
- $115,064
- Assets
- $49,121
- Liabilities
- $49,121
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Danny Oliver (Board President)
People named in this filing
- Danny Oliver (Board President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization provides an educational and charitable youth development program through organized lacrosse instruction, mentorship, and team activities. The program promotes physical fitness, character development, leadership, and sportsmanship while ensuring access to participation through reduced fees, scholarships, and shared equipment for youth in the community.
What it reported doing in 2025
During the tax year, our organization operated a community-based youth lacrosse program dedicated to providing affordable athletic, educational, and character-building opportunities for children and adolescents in our service area. The program focused on increasing access to organized athletics for youth who may not otherwise be able to participate due to financial or transportation barriers. We organized seasonal teams, practices, and league competition for boys and girls in elementary, middle school, and high school age groups. Volunteer coaches and board members provided instruction in athletic skills, teamwork, leadership, sportsmanship, and personal responsibility. In addition to athletic instruction, the program emphasized academic accountability, positive peer relationships, and mentorship. To ensure accessibility, the organization offered reduced-fee registration and scholarships to families with financial need. Funds raised through donations and sponsorships were used to offset equipment, league fees, field rentals, and uniforms. The organization also maintained a shared equipment program so participants could borrow protective gear and sticks at no cost. Throughout the year, the program conducted practices, games, and skills clinics, and coordinated participation in local and regional leagues and tournaments. Volunteers donated substantial time assisting with coaching, field preparation, transportation coordination, and event operations. As a result of these activities, participating youth had increased opportunities for physical activity, structured after-school engagement, and positive adult mentorship. The organizations programs promoted healthy lifestyles, social development, and community involvement while reducing financial barriers to participation in organized sports.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.2%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -150% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 97% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 58.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.