Liberty Disaster Relief

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611958893
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Liberty, MO, USA
Rating
96
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$168,993
Expenses
$165,275
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$4,162

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Douglas Perry (Senior Pastor Director Board President)

People named in this filing

  • Kenneth Seelig Jr (Associate Pastor - Board Secretary)
  • Douglas Perry (Senior Pastor Director Board President)
  • Alan Rusty McAlister (Associate Pastor Board Treasure)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Feeding the hungry clothing the naked housing the homeless spreading the Gospel by being the hands and feet of Jesus Christ. Constantly urging Christians to be ONE and work toward the things we have in common feed clothing love.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025 we operated a Thrift Store and Community Storehouse warehouse full of donated clothing and housewares and groceries to be redirected to those in need and be available for disaster relief small or large. Included costs of food items given away or sold near cost or at a loss insurance and other expenses. Over 1500 people helped with free stuff and many thousands got discounted products to save money.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 78% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 75% for direct work, 23% for grants, and 1% for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.8%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 29.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 25.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $165K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.