Liberty Counsel

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592986294
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2014
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Orlando, FL, United States
Phone
(407) 875-1776
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,572,566
Expenses
$5,263,709
Assets
$2,666,429
Liabilities
$1,148,815

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Anita Staver (President/Attorney)

Highest reported compensation

  • Mathew Staver (Founder/Chairman): $165,926 total reported compensation
  • Anita Staver (President/Attorney): $163,426 total reported compensation
  • Harry Mihet (VP of Legal Affairs): $145,049 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Liberty Counsel is a Christian ministry that proclaims, advocates, supports, advances, and defends the good news that God in the person of Jesus Christ paid the penalty for our sins and offers forgiveness and eternal life to all who accept him as Lord and Savior. Every ministry and project of Liberty Counsel centers around and is based upon this good news, which is also referred to as the gospel. Our mission statement is: “Restoring the culture by advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of human life and the family.” Liberty Counsel is a corporate expression of Christian believers who profess Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior and join together in regular prayer, study of the Bible, praise an.

What it reported doing in 2014

LITIGATION: (See Schedule O for description.)LITIGATION: LC staff includes attorneys who assist individuals, organizations, and churches on a pro bono basis with legal issues regarding religious liberty, the sanctity of human life, and the family. LC is committed to representing clients without regard to their ability to pay. Without assistance, most clients could not afford to assert their constitutional rights in court. LC handled more than 800 telephone calls and many hundreds of additional emails and letters requesting legal assistance during the past fiscal year. A total of 149 cases were in active litigation in state or federal courts or had pre-suit status under LC management. Although the vast majority of legal situations brought to LC are resolved without filing lawsuits, litigation that is publicized through our media outreach serves an educational purpose by informing the public regarding constitutional law. Quality in litigation is of paramount importance to LC, especially since most of the cases falling within its mission are likely to create important legal precedent for future cases. In a well-documented doctoral dissertation, Professor Hans Hacker concluded that LC accomplishes more with its resources than any other similar legal organization. The following brief synopsis of the hundreds of cases and other legal actions LC undertook for the fiscal year is a small sample of actual activities. The highlights listed below illustrate the motto: Restoring the Culture by Advancing Religious Freedom, the Sanctity of Human Life, and the Family.Advancing Religious Freedom: Successfully defended a student in Nassau County, Florida, after he faced wrongful persecution following a complaint by an atheist organization for stating "God bless America" while delivering a school public announcement. The school district apologized and said it will now welcome such messages from students. Stopped Lake Worth, Florida, zoning officials from harassing churches with threats and videotaping services in an effort to force churches to obtain a business license or close. The churches were being targeted for harassment by a homosexual city council member. Presented oral argument at a federal court of appeals and resolved many cases involving Child Evangelism Fellowship Good News Clubs in multiple states where school districts formerly discriminated against the Christian clubs in terms of use of the facilities, time of use, fees, and announcements or advertisements. Filed an important brief at the U.S. Supreme Court urging the Court to return to the original intent of the First Amendment Establishment Clause and abandon its confused line of cases that allow an "offended" observer power to censor religious words or displays. Continued to fight against the ObamaCare law and the HHS Employer Mandate, which requires that employers provide contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs and devices. Filed briefs at the Supreme Court and other federal courts of appeal challenging the contraceptive and abortion mandate and the federal subsidies. Defended the constitutional rights of students who are members of Fellowship of Christian Athletes in Lake County, Florida, where the school district was seeking to restrict access and limit the right to meet on campus. Filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court, which subsequently ruled in Town of Greece v. Galloway that opening a town meeting in prayer does not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Defended the Allegheny County Council after an atheist organization opposed the display of the national motto, "In God We Trust." Successfully defended homeowners in Kissimmee, Florida, when they faced religious discrimination from their homeowner's association that tried to stop the couple from displaying two small statues of Mary and Jesus while allowing other homeowners to display human skulls and topless Greek statues. Filed an important brief at the U.S. Supreme Court to defend the right

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 78
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.5%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 87.3%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $23.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.1%; rating input score 99; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 62.5%; rating input score 62; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.5%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.1%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 33.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 82.5% of revenue deployed · 87.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $166K · 9 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.