Li Transportation Management Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
112692275
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2010
Location
Wantagh, NY, USA
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Reported finances

Revenue
$177
Expenses
$44,768
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the mobility of all constituent groups on li and to advocate positions consistent with that goal to interested third parties. To facilitate the development of appropriate programs aiding mobility and to operate programs, systems and facilities to improve mobility. This mission must be balanced with the knowledge that "quality of life" is crucial to our constituents and that issues such as (but not limited to) air pollution, energy conservation, road safety and noise abatement must be considered when policy is determined. Services include the promotion of carpool matching; vanpooling; telecommuting; trip chaining; compressed work schedules; flex time;

What it reported doing in 2010

To improve the mobility of all constituent groups on long island and to advocate positions consistent with that goal to interested third parties. To facilitate the development of appropriate programs aiding mobility and to operate programs, systems and facilities to improve mobility. This mission must be balanced with the knowledge that "quality of life" is crucial to our constituents and that issues such as (but not limited to) air pollution, energy conservation, road safety and noise abatement must be considered when policy is determined.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 0
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 15.7%; rating input score 16

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -25,192.7%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 15.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $6K · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 1 filing year from 2010
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.