Lhs Goal Line Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274314515
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Ashtabula, OH, USA
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Winter Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,000
Expenses
$3,500
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Andria Juhola (President 2024 Elected)
  • Jenny Westerfield (Co Vice President 2024 Elected)

People named in this filing

  • Andria Juhola (President 2024 Elected)
  • Jenny Westerfield (Co Vice President 2024 Elected)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide support and encouragement to the Lakeside High School football teams

What it reported doing in 2025

The LHS Goal Line Club provides support and encouragement to the Lakeside High School Football Program. Fundraiser events such as the Lift_A-Thon where the team family and community participate in games and other fun activities and eat as a big team at a picnic. An end of season celebration banquet is also organized with catered food for players and their family being provided as a way to recognize their achievements. Awards and trophies are given to coaches and players as well. During the season we provide snacks meals fruit and hydrating beverages in the fieldhouse for the players to have before and after practices. During games small school spirit items are given to the fans to cheer on the team

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 76.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.6% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 57% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -91.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.