Leyton Public School Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364581742
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Dalton, NE, USA
Phone
3083772301
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,420
Expenses
$17,742
Assets
$142,395

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHERI WEIDEMAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SHERI WEIDEMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • SARAH DYKMAN (TREASURER)
  • ALISON HALEY (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Organization is exclusively for educational purposes within the meaning of section 5-1(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. Subject in any event to the foregoing, the specific purposes of the corporation are to solicit and receive contributions, gifts, or devises of both real or personal property from individuels, foundations, partnerhsips, associations, governmental bodies, public or private corporatons, or other entities, and to maintain, use and apply, both directly and indirectly, the whole or any part of the income thereform and the principal therof exclusively for the benefit of or to carry out the purposes of the school district of leyton (leyton public schools) which shall include, but not be limited to, providing financial assistance to the graduates of the leyton public school to assist them in their pursuit of post-secondary education under prodedures developed in conjunction with the board of education of leyton public schools.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provide financial assistance to leyton public school graduates in their pursuit of post-secondary education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 93% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -88.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.03; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -72.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.