Leyden Township Community Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853324358
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Franklin Park, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8474558616
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Banks, Pantries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $101,776
- Expenses
- $28,938
- Assets
- $318,462
- Liabilities
- $809
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jamie Losurdo (President)
People named in this filing
- Jamie Losurdo (President)
- James Caporusso (Secretary)
- Rocco Biscaglio (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Leyden Township Community Foundation is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes in accordance with §501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (or the corresponding provision of any future United State Internal Revenue law) and Section 103.05(a) of the Illinois General Not For Profit Corporation Act, 805 ILCS 105/101.01, et seq. More specifically, the corporation is organized to raise funds for the provision of a food pantry, clothes, toiletries, household essentials, holiday gifts. and other beneficial services to residents and charitable non-profits located in Leyden Township, Illinois.
What it reported doing in 2025
The provision of a food pantry, clothing, toiletries, household essentials, holiday gifts. scholarships, and other beneficial services to residents and charitable non-profits located in Leyden Township, Cook County, Illinois. Distributed food to over 200 families weekly.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 61% for direct work, and 39% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 25
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 12.6%; rating input score 13
- Program expense ratio: 44.5%; rating input score 44
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 71.6%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 33.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 43.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 12.6% of revenue deployed · 44.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.