Lexington Hamline Community Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237346733
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6516453207
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Coalitions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $92,950
- Expenses
- $60,383
- Assets
- $1,058,153
- Liabilities
- $1,351
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARISA MCDANIEL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ALISON SCHAUB (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- CARRIE MOORE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANN ELENBASS (DIRECTOR)
- CHARLOTTE HANLEY-JACOBSON (SECRETARY)
- CRAIG TOMERA (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Civic involvement
What it reported doing in 2024
Building community and connecting neighbors to improve quality of life in our neighborhood is central to our mission and work. We do this by working with a core set of volunteer block leaders to communicate information about events, service opportunities, crime and safety issues, housing and development issues, and information related to our parks and open spaces in lex-ham. We also publish quarterly print newsletters and monthly e-newsletters to 700+ neighbors, keep an updated website, post on social media. We hold at least 6-12 public and community events per year. Neighborhood advocacy is also important to our organization. We work with the leaders and staff at the union park district council and ward 1 leadership in the city to advocate on behalf of our residents for needs related to crime and safety, housing and development, and parks and open spaces in addition to hosting our community events. We coordinate services and programs with the city of st. Paul parks and recreation department.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 94.9%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.52; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8.8% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $57K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.