Lewisville Pee Wee Football Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237457157
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Lewisville, TX, USA
Phone
2142872974
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$102,362
Expenses
$101,311
Assets
$15,659
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CLINT OWENS (PRESIDENT)
  • BRIAN GRANDISON (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CLINT OWENS (PRESIDENT)
  • BRIAN GRANDISON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ROCKIE MCMILLAN ALLEN (SECRETARY/ TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the highest ideals of sportsmanship, fellowship, and americanism through charitable and educational activities; to provide fun, reacreation, and competition for all participants, regardless of race, creed, or color; to provide a supervised football program.

What it reported doing in 2015

This organization provides a supervised peewee football and cheerleading program and an opportunity for adult members to volunteer their time to coach, instruct, supervise, or participate in the activities of the organization.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -37.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 39.8% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.