Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541273467
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Richmond, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8042629887
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Botanical Gardens, Arboreta and Botanical Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,494,627
- Expenses
- $10,672,256
- Assets
- $42,859,049
- Liabilities
- $2,429,020
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRUITT B ALCOTT (PAST PRESIDENT)
- KATHERINE DUVAL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- STEVEN R WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN TRADER (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- BRIAN TRADER (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $236,269 total reported compensation
- ALICE BAKER (CHIEF ADVANCEMENT OFFICER): $208,145 total reported compensation
- MITZI SHIFFLETT (VP, ACCOUNTING AND ADMIN): $134,742 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mission - we connect people to plants by inspiring communities to explore and conserve nature.our commitments - organizational sustainability, environmental resiliency, collaboration and gathering, social responsibilityour vision - we are a Virginia garden of international significance leading in horticultural and educational excellence. We cultivate experiences that enhance each person's relationship with the natural world.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education and exhibitions - the education and exhibitions department is responsible for developing and coordinating a diverse array of multi-generational exhibits, events, educational programs, guest resources, and community alliances that encourage life-long learning about the plant world. Programs are designed to engage visitors of all ages, from toddlers to seniors, in active learning, where first-hand experience and observation of the natural world help to build knowledge, expand awareness and encourage attitudes of stewardship. The varied programs include adult continuing education classes, guided tours, year-round pre-school and elementary school guided programs, self-guided "scavenger" hunts, informal gardening experiences, natural history encounters, festivals, performing arts and environmental education. Initiatives include elementary school outreach programs as wehorticulture - the horticulture department is responsible for the heart of the garden's missions of display, research, education and community outreach. Permanent collections are integrated into varied garden settings in 35-intensely cultivated acres (on an 82-acre property), some themed (e.g., asian valley, cochrane rose garden.) year-round display in the conservatory and annual seasonal displays in the outdoor garden are interpreted through labels, signs and the presence of horticulturists and gardeners able to answer guest questions while they go about the business of designing, planting, pruning, trimming, irrigating and weeding. Global horticulture, regional best practices, water management and sustainability are manifested in the design and maintenance of the various gardens. The department manages a large volunteer cadre in the work of the garden, particularly in the community kitchen garden, which provides fresh fruit and vegetables free of charge to feedmore, the local feeding program, and to grow plants for our own volunteer plant sale. The department assists visitors with botanical questions or concerns, provides input to the computerized data base of the plant collections, plans and organizes future collections, assists in the plant selection and installation of plantings at selected community beautification sites, actively maintains plant collections at a future satellite site and leads in the design and implementation of the garden's largest seasonal events (m&t butterflies live and dominion energy gardenfest of lights). As professional development and training programs for environmental educators, teachers, and members of the green industry. The garden serves as a convener and communication link for community greening and beautification conversations across the metropolitan area. Guest resources include the lora m. Robins library, containing over 7,000 items, several databases on plant and seed sources, plant information, and the garden's plant collection, and the hort helpline - volunteers who research and answer public inquiries about plants. Other guest resources include changing art exhibits on botanical subjects and the bright spots program that highlights the seasonal "must-see" plants in the garden. Community alliances include significant university relationships and intentional partnerships with multiple allied plant societies, garden clubs, and green industry organizations. The garden also houses the herbarium virginicum, the joint collection of preserved plant specimens amassed by Virginia commonwealth university and the garden.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 77.7%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.9%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.02; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66% of revenue deployed · 77.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 30 of 30 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $8.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $236K · 35 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $13M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.