Lewis County Farm Bureau
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 743251606
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Onalaska, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3609852347
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Agricultural Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $51,082
- Expenses
- $44,319
- Assets
- $120,821
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ryan Ells (President)
- Ryan Thode (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Ryan Ells (President)
- Ryan Thode (Vice President)
- Lynn Mahoney (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Lewis County Farm Bureau is to increase public awareness and support of agriculture, promote agricultural production and positively impact the lives of farmers and ranchers in Lewis County and throughout Washington State with solutions for the challenges faced by agriculture, forestry and natural resources as we practice good stewardship of our lands.
What it reported doing in 2018
Activities related to membership drive and providing information relating to agricultural issues to the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 70% for direct work, and 30% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.8%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 95.4%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.2%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.73; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.8% of revenue deployed · 95.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2012 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.