Lewis & Clark Exploratory Center of Virginia Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
542014680
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Charlottesville, VA, USA
Phone
4349967282
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$93,154
Expenses
$126,649
Assets
$1,391,368
Liabilities
$248,625

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Malou S Dichtel (President)
  • DAN MAHON (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Diana Amatucci (Director)
  • Brooke Asher (Director)
  • ELIZABETH CHEW (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To establish a unique Lewis & Clark exploratory center for scientific and educational purposes, open to and for the benefit of the public with focus on the conception, origin and legacy of the Lewis & Clark expedition.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024 we continued serving small and medium groups but not large groups, in order to protect the health and well-being of our employees. We served public, private, and homeschool groups and taught them about the Lewis and Clark Expedition and its local roots. We gave tours to adult groups and tourists from both in-state and out-of-state.We ran outdoor arts programs for visitors of all ages related to exploration, such as journaling based on the Lewis and Clark journals and photography that connects historical exploration with modern skills. We continued research and exhibition planning for an expanded interpretation of York, the enslaved member of the Lewis & Clark Expedition. We worked on watershed issues in partnership with other area nonprofits and presented student-made watershed videos created on field trips to the Exploratory Center. We continued to write for the Thomas Jefferson Planning District watershed newsletter.In 2024 we implemented the school lesson plan and interactive art exhibition developed for the City of Charlottesvilles Sister Cities Commission. We made presentations on York to other organizations, such as the United Way, and we researched and published articles on history and museum interpretation in a regional newspaper and a national magazine, including articles focused on York. Throughout the year, we worked with volunteers from the University of Virginia on renovating our full-sized boat replicas and collaborated with scholars to further develop a French foreign language tour.As hosts, we carried forward and completed planning for the 2024 Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Foundation national conference, which took place in Charlottesville in September 2024. We participated in the Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Foundations governance (including one Board of Directors membership) and in the broader planning for their conference. We continued to open our building to events for other nonprofits and government agencies, participated in the BAA Rivanna River Festival, hosted a conference for teachers of deaf and blind students organized by VCU, and hosted a meeting of the Charlottesville Albemarle Tourism Bureau and their stakeholders.In the summer of 2024 we again ran small group camps for children related to exploration. We partnered with CBI Forest School on outdoor programs, including photography, filmmaking, and other skills of exploration. Throughout the fall, we continued our small- to medium-sized field trip programs and adult programs. We offered a variety of community programs, including an event focused on fishing and art projects involving the river and a community event focusing on Indigenous cuisine. We also continued extensive research and program development to support the 2025 LCTHF Annual Meeting.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 6
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 50%; rating input score 50
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.37 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -36%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.99; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68% of revenue deployed · 50% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 11 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $63K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.