Lewis & Clark
Legal name: Lewis & Clark College
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930386858
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Portland, Oregon, USA
- Phone
- 503-768-7000
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Undergraduate College (4-year)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $243,823,678
- Expenses
- $243,920,241
- Assets
- $639,129,563
- Liabilities
- $181,259,718
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
48 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBIN HOLMES-SULLIVAN (PRESIDENT)
- MARINUS WIEWEL (FORMER PRESIDENT - EMERITUS)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBIN HOLMES-SULLIVAN (PRESIDENT): $494,750 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER JOHNSON (DEAN OF THE LAW SCHOOL): $353,223 total reported compensation
- JOHN PARRY (INTERIM DEAN OF THE LAW SCHOOL): $323,487 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Lewis & Clark College is a private liberal arts college in Portland, Oregon, offering undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs through its College of Arts & Sciences, Law School, and Graduate School of Education & Counseling.
What it reported doing in 2024
Academic support: lewis & clark is committed to the academic success of every student and carries out its mission through giving each student the opportunity to discover themselves and the world through the study of the arts, the humanities, and the mathematical, natural, and social sciences. Over ninety-one percent of full time faculty hold a ph.d. Or terminal degree in their fields. Many of our faculty are active in research and scholarships and have been tremendously successful in securing prestigious awards and appointments including fulbright alumni ambassador, council for the advancement and support of education (case)and the carnegie foundation for the advancement for teaching for teacher of year awards. Several faculty members have recently been recognized for excellence in teaching with graves awards in humanities and numerous faculty members have been awarded fellowships to conduct research and teach abroad. An average class size of 17 allows close contact between professors and students and creates opportunities for discussion and collaboration. Over 90 percent of undergraduate students receive financial assistance through merit-based scholarships, need-based grants, loans, or campus employment.in the graduate school of education and counseling, students and faculty work closely together in a variety of contexts, from intensive field-based internships to co-authoring research articles. Students learn not only to be excellent practitioners, but leaders and change agents. The law school faculty make themselves available outside of class for mentoring, and to expand on topics taught in classes. In addition, the law school has a program for students who feel the need for academic support during law school, as well as a program designed to enhance the likelihood of bar passage upon graduation. Beyond anyspecialized majors, students hone their abilities as knowledgeable and logical thinkers, articulate speakers, and effective writers. The college provides many resources to support students. These services range from tutoring at the math skills center to support from one of our counselors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 54% for direct work, and 46% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 89
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.5%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 87.7%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.62; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 91.5% of revenue deployed · 87.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 27 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $213.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $495K · 48 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $12.6M reported
- Consistency: 45 of 45 current checks pass
- Schedules: 13 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 21 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.