Leveling the Playing Field Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452682632
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
3018445620
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,614,808
Expenses
$6,811,329
Assets
$4,129,657
Liabilities
$893,739

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MAX LEVITT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MAX LEVITT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $156,546 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Leveling the playing field gives underprivileged children the opportunity to enjoy the mental and physical benefits of youth sports participation. We do this through the donation of used and excess sporting equipment to programs and schools serving low-income communities.our donations allow programs to allocate funds saved by lowering registration fees, expanding their scholarship programs, enhancing their existing athletic program and/or developing new ones.

What it reported doing in 2024

Collection and distribution program: the majority of the equipment in our warehouse is a result of our collection program that brings in donated sporting goods from individual donors. Below are the main avenues that equipment reached our warehouse through the collection program:-everyday people come to our warehouse to drop off equipment from their home. It ranges from a bag of gear to a full suv full of equipment.-we run collection drives during most weekends in the fall & spring. We partner with sports leagues, tournaments, school events, neighborhood events and other community events where we feel we can bring in a lot of donated equipment.-we have a large volunteer collection program where the community runs their own drives to benefit our mission. These often include eagle scout projects and mitzvah projects.-we have bins located throughout the community at local parks, ice rinks, sports goods stores, fitness centers and other venues.we also receive equipment from manufacturers such as under armour and stx. These are typically items the companies are looking to liquidate and write off. In addition to the manufacturers and some sports goods stores liquidating to us, we also receive equipment from professional sports teams and collegiate athletic departments throughout the year. Volunteers work in the warehouse to collect, sort, and inventory the donations. Most of these volunteers are in middle or high school, but we also regularly see corporate groups and college students. In a non-covid year, we will see about 1,000 volunteers per year in the warehouse. On average the breakdown of where distributed items are donated looks like 50% schools, 35% youth development/after school programs and 15% pure sports teams and leagues. To receive equipment from us, programs have to submit an equipment request form and then conduct either a site visit or interview with our staff. Once approved, we invite programs to visit our warehouse as many times as they need without ever having to reapply. Some programs come once or twice a year and others we see literally every few weeks throughout the year.certain surplus items or items that are not size appropriate for the kids we serve are sold online or directly to a sporting goods consignment store such as play-it-again sports. We call with the gear 4 good program, however, it is not a standalone program, it's all part of the collection and distribution of sprots equipment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 69% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 78.5%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $543.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 63.5%; rating input score 63; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.6%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70% of revenue deployed · 78.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $157K · 14 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 206 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 66 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.