Level-equity Building Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862161510
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4129697151
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,016,601
- Expenses
- $326,880
- Assets
- $1,219,384
- Liabilities
- $15,147
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JASON TIGANO (CEO)
- DAVID CALIGUIRI (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JASON TIGANO (CEO): $114,125 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Level: equity buildings (level) provides a holistic, system-innovating program model to develop homeowners, housing stock, and communities at a pace complementing each other. We build enthusiasm in communities by hosting events and community activities, with advoacy opportunities around homeownership.
What it reported doing in 2025
Rehab for resale program - working with communities and local municipalities, level will acquire, fundraise, and facilitate construction activities on single and multi-family housing projects that create home ownership opportunities for residents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 89% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 22
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 7.7%; rating input score 8
- Program expense ratio: 24%; rating input score 24
- Fundraising efficiency: $104.27 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 67.8%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.73; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 34.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 50.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 7.7% of revenue deployed · 24% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $78K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $114K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.