Lets Help the Next
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922950124
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Draper, UT, USA
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,260
- Expenses
- $13,290
- Assets
- $18,795
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mishma D Buisson (DirectorTrustee President)
- Michel Bergeron (DirectorTrusteeVice President)
People named in this filing
- Mishma D Buisson (DirectorTrustee President)
- Michel Bergeron (DirectorTrusteeVice President)
- Bidford Jean-Baptiste (DirectorTrusteeTresurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission statement is to help vibrant and beautiful individuals full of potential who have the will to gain an education to create something extraordinary.
What it reported doing in 2025
Lets Help The Next Need-Based Scholarship from BYU-Idaho and Beyond. This program allows international students to submit an application to Lets Help The Next requesting financial assistance to cover tuition or their student life expenses. Those applications are processed followed by a short interview to assess their critical needs. Then when the applicant meets our mission and vision as a foundation the Board of Directors respond with an offer of assistance which sometimes goes toward their tuition or their rent.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.5%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.4%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 153.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.5% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.