Lets Beehive Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474262935
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Orlando, FL, USA
- Phone
- 4077454458
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $249,735
- Expenses
- $169,793
- Assets
- $97,908
- Liabilities
- $5,072
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dr Andrea Dunn (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Dr Andrea Dunn (Executive Dir.): $28,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our Mission is to provide innovative HIV/AIDS health education workshops and prevention programs for children and adults to increase HIV awareness, reduce transmission of new HIV infections, and improve therapeutic outcomes among those living with HIV/AIDS.
What it reported doing in 2024
This year we launched our She is PrEPalicious? HIV Prevention Program and Multi-Media Marketing Campaign in collaboration with the Florida Department of Health. This was the first campaign in Orlando, FL and second in the State of Florida to create a PrEP marketing campaign specifically for Black women. This campaign reached over 4.5 million people and we? ve provided PrEP education to more than 100 women and girls and 40 health care providers in the Central Florida Area since then. We hosted our 7th Annual I am a Queen Bee? HIV Awareness Symposium. Our theme was ? Queen of Hearts? where we highlighted several ways love is overpowering HIV. Our panelists consisted of two mixed status Serodiscordant couples that shared their love story as well as highlighted a panel of female HIV advocates who have the heart in helping end the HIV epidemic in our community. We awarded two women in advocacy with the Queen Bee? Award and educated more than 75 attendees. This event was sponsored by the Florida Department of Health, Black Women? s Health Imperative, and AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Southern AIDS Coalition, and HER Initiative. In efforts to combat the increased rates of HIV among Black women in Orange County, FL, we launched our research project with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Interdisciplinary Research Leaders IRL - ? Removing Obstacles to HIV Prevention for Black Women? in collaboration with two associate professors, Dr. Joe and Dr. Brown, at University of Central Florida and Rollins College, respectively. With the help of our colleagues and research assistants, we hosted two townhall meetings to hear from people in our community to better identify what the public health concerns, needs, and barriers are for Black women to access care in Orange County. We continued to establish several more partnerships and collaborations local business and several faith-based organizations to help increase HIV awareness and prevention messaging. Hosted several HIV Prevention Classes and we distributed more than 30,000 condoms throughout the Central Florida Area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 5
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.6%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.5%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 31.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.6% of revenue deployed · 89.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $151K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $28K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.