Leonard Parker Pool Institute for Health
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851211082
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Allentown, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4842241876
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $2,505,335
- Assets
- $87,316,741
- Liabilities
- $171,563
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SAMANTHA A SHAAK PHD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- BRIAN A NESTER DO (FORMER TRUSTEE): $5,806,649 total reported compensation
- SAMANTHA A SHAAK PHD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $178,243 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The leonard parker pool institute for health encourages and facilitates cross-sector collaboration to enable meaningful, place-based improvements in the health of our community. Our mission is to provide meaningful and sustained improvements in overall health through innovations targeting key issues affecting our region.
What it reported doing in 2024
The leonard parker pool institute for health acts as a convener, facilitator, innovator, and idea importer. It serves as a reliable source for relevant qualitative and quantitative data, and measurement of health improvement, particularly for the most vulnerable communities in the lehigh valley. Following a belief that the health of the community is only as good as our least healthy neighbors, the pool institute for health aspires to sustainably improve the systemic factors that influence health, such as education, access to safe and healthy food & housing, and overall health and well-being. The pool institute for health was created to carry forward the legacy of leonard and dorothy rider pool and expand lehigh valley health network's leadership and service for health.to enable the pool institute for health to fulfill its vision effectively, institute leadership uses both local inputs and proven best practices from around the country to devise a set of processes to carry out the work. These include:- using data, both numbers and stories, and small-area analysis to more effectively understand target neighborhoods and the lived-experience of residents.- practicing authentic community engagement with the goal of forging strong partnerships with residents.- strengthening cross-sector partnerships across local non-profits to build and enrich place-based approaches to collaboratively address the factors that affect health.- development of a "backbone" infrastructure that seeks to add a management support layer for cross-sector collaborations.in an effort increase connectivity across community-level programming and interventions, the pool institute for health will support cross-sector efforts around the following four focus areas:- community well-being: safety, mental health, overall well-being- education: cradle-to-career pipeline- housing: permanent, mixed-income housing- food and nutrition: economic mobility
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 34.85; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.3%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -84.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5.8M · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 109 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.