Lenam Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463805614
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
McHenry, IL, USA
Phone
3096965423
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$134,004
Expenses
$89,744
Assets
$71,375
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jesus Acosta (President, Board Chairman)

People named in this filing

  • Jesus Acosta (President, Board Chairman)
  • Richard Dylan Newell (Treasurer)
  • Rebeca Newell (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

LENAM Inc.'s purpose is to raise funding to support LENAM AC, a non-profit organization in Mexico. Funds are sent by wire transfer from LENAM Inc. (US) to LENAM AC (Mexico) which uses the funds for children placed in its care by the Mexican government.

What it reported doing in 2025

LENAM Inc. has raised funds and directed them to LENAM AC, which serves children placed in its care by the Mexican government. Without the funding from LENAM Inc., LENAM AC would not be able to serve their struggling demographic as they do today.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 33%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 33.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $90K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.