Lena Pope Home Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
756003583
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fort Worth, TX, USA
Phone
8172552500
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,701,006
Expenses
$14,331,468
Assets
$41,576,406
Liabilities
$5,441,796

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

53 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JONI THOMPSON HORTON (PRESIDENT)
  • CARLO ANDREANI (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MERRY ELGIN (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MERRY ELGIN (CEO): $413,773 total reported compensation
  • TODD TUDOR (CFO): $217,558 total reported compensation
  • CATHERINE SHEFFIELD (CAO): $193,067 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of lena pope home, inc. (lena pope) is to equip children, families, caregivers, and community with a strong foundation through counseling, education and behavior interventions.

What it reported doing in 2024

School and community based services (scbs)lena pope's school and community based services (scbs) are designed to give at-risk youth the skills needed to make successful choices and either keep them from becoming involved in delinquent behavior and/or prevent and disrupt their formal involvement in the juvenile justice or child welfare systems. Lena pope provides counseling, case management, and skill-building group services to youth and their families in tarrant, johnson, and parker counties. Many of these programs are provided in the homes and communities of the families they serve.the majority of services are provided through contracts with tarrant county juvenile services, Texas juvenile justice department, school districts, municipal law enforcement agencies and municipal court systems. Scbs works with a range of children and teens at all points of involvement with the juvenile justice system. These programs include a first offender program titled second opportunity for success (a registered trademark of lena pope) and an in-home evidence-based family counseling program called functional family therapy (fft). Second opportunity for success provides parent and youth skill building groups paired with three months of post group follow up services. Functional family therapy is a strengths-based and relational focused therapy that is tailored to each unique family and their diverse needs. The focus of fft is on learned skills to improve family functioning, working specifically on topics such as parenting, communication, problem solving, family negativity, and other behavior challenges. These programs served over 1,300 clients in fiscal year 2025. Additionally, lena pope partners with tarrant county juvenile services and fort worth independent school district to provide the juvenile justice alternative education program (jjaep). This program provides a unique educational alternative for at-risk youth and is designed to promote grade-level academic progress, improve school attendance and classroom behavior, and address other needs of youth and their families. This alternative education program provides a safe environment where students develop social skills and decision-making capabilities needed to be successful when they return to their home campuses. Jjaep promotes self-sufficiency and self-discipline as a healthy alternative to academic misconduct and criminal activity.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.6%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 73.1%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.9; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.5%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.6% of revenue deployed · 73.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 43 of 43 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $10.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $414K · 53 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $964K reported
  • Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.