Lemonade International Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262265505
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Wake Forest, NC, USA
Phone
9197928076
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$459,134
Expenses
$451,702
Assets
$70,845
Liabilities
$7,774

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Charles Knox (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Charles Knox (Executive Director): $89,926 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We exist to stand in solidarity with Guatemalan leaders as they break the cycle of poverty, violence, and injustice through education, gang prevention, and community relief for families in the poorest neighborhoods of Guatemala City.

What it reported doing in 2025

In our partnerships with Asociacion Comunitaria Alcance and other Guatemalan nonprofits, Lemonade International sustained support and operations through one-time and ongoing donations in 6 academic centers serving over 1,000 children with daily meals, mentoring, and academic formation with the goal of gang violence prevention. We distributed 4,500 vitamins to 180 children and El Carmen Center staff. Partnerships with local Guatemalan restaurants such as Little Caesars and Wendy's allowed hot, daily meals to go even farther, providing meals for 180 children as well as their families. Through a partnership with Abbott Laboratories and Asociacion Comunitaria Alcance, 216 children struggling with malnutrition at four Alcance centers received support through the PediaSure(TM) nutrition program and achieved healthy growth milestones in just six months. Thanks to a partnership with Trauma Free World and Back2Back Ministries, we were able to provide a full-time psychologist as part of our holistic care model for families and children. Support covered the construction of a small psychology clinic and was matched by in-country donations to provide office furniture. Funding allowed Lemonade and partner staff to attend the Alianza de Cristianos y Huerfanos (Alliance for Christians and Orphans) "Pure Religion" Summit with over 700 attendees from 20 countries. Latin American leaders were encouraged and challenged to care for orphans, vulnerable children, and those in need. Several staff members traveled to see best emotional health practices at academic centers in Mexico and in turn gave back by hosting in-person and virtual trainings in Guatemala, encouraging and empowering teachers, cooks, and staff. Through local businesses, Lemonade purchased and distributed school supplies and shoes to more than 200 children, investing in the local economy and allowing children to attend public school and actively participate in taking responsibility for their education. Lemonade's work expanded through new partnerships to support activities in three new neighborhoods.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.5%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.6%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.5% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $360K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $90K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 43 of 43 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.