Leighton Frederick Sandys Ford Jr Scholarship Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581460015
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Phone
- 7043659024
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $92,338
- Expenses
- $118,421
- Assets
- $1,487,290
- Liabilities
- $75,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DR LEIGHTON FORD (CHAIRMAN): $144,177 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The leighton frederick sandys ford scholarship fund provides funding to the foundation for the carolinas and to leighton ford mionistries for young ministers to attend certain events to enhance their ministerial services and to complete or further their education.
What it reported doing in 2014
The leighton frederick sandys ford scholarship fund provided funds to the foundation for the carolinas to provide scholarships for ministerial students and to leighton ford monsotries to fund certain programs designed to enhance the performance and skills of young ministers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 56
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.2%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 42.9%; rating input score 43; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -28.2%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.56; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 185.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $144K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 43/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.