Leigh High School Sports Boosters

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922494566
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Jose, CA, USA
Phone
4085077546
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,977
Expenses
$21,043
Assets
$39,924
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MAUREEN CURRIE (PRESIDENT)
  • TODD VARNELL (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MONIKA SALQUIST (TREASURER)
  • MAUREEN CURRIE (PRESIDENT)
  • ELIZABETH BASALLAJE (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote school spirit amoung students, parents, faculty, coaches, and the community.to encourage participation in the club to aid and assist in the development and enhancement of all athletic teams at leigh high school ("lhs").to acquire by purchase, gift, devise, bequest, exchange, promotion, and other fund raising activities, such funds and other personal property as may be necessary and useful in improving lhs athletic programs and facilities.

What it reported doing in 2024

To acquire by purchase, gift, devise, bequest, exchange, promotion, and other fund raising activities, such funds and other personal property as may be necessary and useful in improving lhs athletic programs and facilities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 80% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 40.5%; rating input score 41
  • Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 54.2%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.9; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -58.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 37.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 40.5% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $19K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.