Leigh High School Spirit Boosters Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
834179104
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Los Gatos, CA, USA
Phone
4082505741
Rating
94
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreation& Sports N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$135,786
Expenses
$118,072
Assets
$62,218
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER MOORE (PRESIDENT)
  • CAMILLA HANSEN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JENNIFER MOORE (PRESIDENT)
  • CAMILLA HANSEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • GRETCHEN MCGARRY (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of lhssb is to promote a positive image of spirit at leigh high school and throughout the community. This shall be accomplished through:1. Providing a framework for fundraising to support spirit activities at leigh high school.2. Creating a relationship between the community, the school, and school booster for the purpose of encouraging school spirit.3. Providing a positive image of spirit at leigh high school and throughout the community.4. Encouraging student participation in interscholastic athletics.5. Encouraging parent attendance at all spirit activities.6. Promoting sportsmanship among spectators and participants.

What it reported doing in 2024

Lhssb hold fundraising events throughout the season that benefit up to 60 cheer families by defraying costs related to competitions, travel, uniforms and other organization exp.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 29.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 29.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $118K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.