Lehigh Acres Spring Festival Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237417232
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Lehigh Acres, FL, USA
Phone
2393691168
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fairs

Reported finances

Revenue
$60,634
Expenses
$63,757
Assets
$26,302
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JUDY CARTER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JUDY CARTER (PRESIDENT)
  • VICKI Z CULVER (TREASURER)
  • CHERYL DUTKA (VICE PRESIDNET)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The lehigh spring festival is a non profit organization that each year provides an annual parade as well as a carnival, music festivities and other annual events for the lehigh acres community and surrounding areas. It provides fun and entertainment for the community with all volunteers and no employees.

What it reported doing in 2014

The lehigh spring festival is a non profit organization that each year provides an annual parade as well as a carnival, music fetivities and other annual events for the lehigh acres community and surrounding areas. It provides fun and entertainment for the community with all volunteers and no employees.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 67% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.2%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 125.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.