Legends Soccer Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473143647
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Nov 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Antelope, CA, USA
- Phone
- 916-804-2284
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $172,005
- Expenses
- $147,844
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREW PONOMAR (CEO)
People named in this filing
- ANDREW PONOMAR (CEO)
- STELLA PLUKCHI (SECRETARY)
- LIA HLAMAZDA (CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Legends Soccer Club is a non-profit organization dedicated to teaching and developing players of all ages, built on the European model of player development, focusing on technical excellence, tactical awareness, and preparing players to compete at the highest levels of the game.
Legends Soccer Club is a Sacramento-based nonprofit youth soccer organization offering competitive teams from U9 through U16 and a semi-professional squad. The club trains players using a European development model emphasizing technical excellence and tactical awareness, and provides pathways to professional opportunities through international showcases in Germany and Spain. It also aims to make high-level soccer accessible regardless of financial background, offering a free one-week training pass and tryouts for new players.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 17%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 38.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.