Legal Outreach Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133214627
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Long Island City, NY, USA
Phone
7187520222
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,814,262
Expenses
$3,175,679
Assets
$6,980,913
Liabilities
$1,882,651

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TAMIKA EDWARDS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • TAMIKA EDWARDS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PRESIDENT): $219,000 total reported compensation
  • BETHSHEBA COOPER (CO-DIRECTOR,SECRETARY): $178,154 total reported compensation
  • JAMES B O'NEAL (SENIOR SPECIALIST): $178,044 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Legal outreach is a college preparatory organization that uses instruction in law as a catalyst for inspiring and motivating youth from under-resourced communities in New York city to strive for academic excellence and higher education. The organization changes the educational trajectory of urban youth by implementing a series of legal and educational programs that foster vision, develop skills, instill values and enhance confidence among program participants.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024-25, legal outreach began the school year with 226 students enrolled in its college bound program (70 freshmen, 64 sophomores, 53 juniors, and 39 seniors). Within the college bound program, we continue to implement our school-year academic advisory program, writing program, con law debate program, mentoring program, professional training program, professional exposure program, parent support program, college admissions program, transition-to-college, and civic engagement and social justice program. We finished the 2024-25 school year with 216 students in the program (65 freshmen, 56 sophomores, 52 juniors, and 39 seniors). Our retention rate for the year was thus 96%. We successfully implemented all elements of the multi-faceted program including the: 1) academic support center; 2) study and life skills program; 3) mentoring program; 4) constitutional law debate program; 5) parent support program; 6) saturday writing program; 7) college admissions program, 8) transition to college program, 9) college support program for our college freshmen. Summer college bound programs, all of which were done virtually, included 10) summer internships for rising 10th grade students; 11) sat prep program for rising 11th graders; and 12) college admissions program and college philosophy class for rising 12th graders.we also helped 100% of graduating legal outreach high school students gain admission to a four-year college. We started the 2024-25 academic year with 39 seniors. Thirty-nine (100 %) completed the program and each was admitted to an average of 8 colleges based upon their overall profile.regarding our feeder program, the summer law institute for rising 9th grade students, we enrolled 161 students into the institutes at brooklyn, cardozo (all female identifying), cuny, fordham (all female identifying), nyu (all male identifying), and st. John's law schools. The rising ninth graders at each institute attended the program from 9:00 am - 4:00 pm, monday through friday for five weeks. They were exposed to legal outreach's criminal justice curriculum, lawyers representing various career paths within the legal profession, legal institutions such as law firms and courthouses, and the practice of law through the culminating event of the summer, a mock-trial competition. Each institute was staffed by two law students and a college intern. Of the 161 students who began the institute, 153 (95%) successfully completed the rigorous five-week program. The attendance rate was 99.67%. Of the 153 students who completed the program, 116 (76%) applied for admission to the college bound program for high school students in grades 9-12.within the college bound program, since 2020 we have facilitated a leadership component called the civic engagement and social justice program. In 2024-25, 129 of legal outreach college bound program students participated in the civic engagement and social justice program, with 24 students serving on the civic engagement and social justice leadership council (sophomores, juniors and seniors), and an additional 13 students taking part in the freshman leadership institute, an initiative to train and prepare freshman for participation on the leadership council as they matriculate through high school.at the end of the school year, we engaged philliber research associates to conduct an extensive evaluation of the college bound program. Among the most relevant statistics for measuring the effectiveness of the program were students' perceptions of the programs' usefulness. Students provided the following average ratings with regard to the value of the components of the college bound program: (1) keeping on track to college (92%) (2) preparing to compete at the collegiate level (91%), (3) improving academic skills (85%), (4) doing well in school (83%). Each of these ratings is well above our projection of 70%. According to the report, 96% of the students served came from minority groups and 88% received free or reduced-price

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 91
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.6%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 75.5%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 70%; rating input score 70; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.8%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.2; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.6% of revenue deployed · 75.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $219K · 12 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.