Legal Aid Bureau

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
720423624
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
New Orleans, LA, USA
Phone
5043246706
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Legal Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$37,573
Expenses
$16,115
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIM DUGAS GLASS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • HON JUNE DARENSBURG (PRESIDENT)
  • RONALD L WILSON (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KIM DUGAS GLASS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MATTHEW K BROWN (BOARD MEMBER)
  • ROGER A STETTER (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide legal services and education

What it reported doing in 2013

Legal services-the individual is interviewed by a staff attorney. If the service requested is a permitted service and the indiviual's financial status meets the requirements of the federal proverty act, then an effort will be made to provide services to this individual.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 27.6%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 64.5%; rating input score 64

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 57.1%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25.2%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -47.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -51.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -88.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 27.6% of revenue deployed · 64.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.