Legacy of Aloha Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 842416349
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Solana Beach, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8587202395
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $160,162
- Expenses
- $211,610
- Assets
- $34,456
- Liabilities
- $368
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSANNE SAXTEN (BOARD CHAIR, PRESIDENT/CEO)
People named in this filing
- SUSANNE SAXTEN (BOARD CHAIR, PRESIDENT/CEO)
- JACQUELINE RENE REED (DIRECTOR, CFO/TREASURER/SECRETARY)
- JAMES ROBERT THIBAUT (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide charitable support for the communities in which t s restaurants are located.
What it reported doing in 2025
Community disaster awareness and response - the organization creates awareness locally and nationally, with the purpose of generating support to provide relief to those affected. Funds raised are granted to community organizations assiting with disaster relief or to individuals affected. Grants to individuals are approved by an independent selection committee not affiliated with the organization or t s restaurants. The committee determines the needs, merits and availability of funds to be distributed by this program, and may require prospective recipients to submit an application or proposal to be considered.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 94.9%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -32.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -113.2% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -65.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $201K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.