Legacy Academy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
301443950
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
3238233265
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,050
Expenses
$5,050
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LUCRECIA NAVA (PRESIDENT/DI)

People named in this filing

  • LUCRECIA NAVA (PRESIDENT/DI)
  • YANIN ARDILA (TREASURER/DI)
  • CHELSEY NGUYEN (SECRETARY/DI)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to develop spaces and resources that serve entire school communities with high standards of practice and authentic care. For our students to truly thrive, they require more than just their basic needs met. Therefore, we aim to provide them with the support and resources necessary, so they can engage with their education completely and become self actualized. Our academic program centers on often silenced narratives and truths, embracing a pluralistic culture. Our students, with their diverse identities and journeys, are reflected and empowered through our curriculum and practices. We additionally believe that legacy academy is an educational lab where other educators can work towards academic excellence and centering students to replicate such practices into their other educational institutions.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our goals are to open: legacy academy - a queer forward tk-12 private school, educator academy - a training/growth space, & community center.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.