Left at the Gate
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821073607
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Hopkins, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8037606145
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $44,303
- Expenses
- $10,235
- Assets
- $100,351
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES C WHITTLE (PRESIDENT & FOUNDER)
People named in this filing
- DR ROBERT FRANK (DIRECTOR)
- MICHELLE HARRIS (DIRECTOR)
- DELLANEY LOVE (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mission statement: left at the gate will provide information, resources and encouragement to the families and friends of those who have lost loved ones to suicide to assist them in navigating the days following the worst day of their lives.vision statement: our vision is to assist every family in every county of South Carolina to receive information on the resources, information, and encouragement necessary to survive the traumatic loss of a loved one, by responding to their loss in an immediate manner. National suicide crisis hotline1-800-273-8255
What it reported doing in 2019
2019 - provided medical & hygenic supplies to people living with the effects of leprosy & secured medical service providers to work with patients with particular medical & dental needs. We help resident-patients along with outside patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 27
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 12.1%; rating input score 12
- Program expense ratio: 52.2%; rating input score 52
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 76.9%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.8; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 12.1% of revenue deployed · 52.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.