Leeds Ambulance Service
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 450414380
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Leeds, ND, USA
- Phone
- 7014662000
- Rating
- 96
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulance, Emergency Medical Transport Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,755
- Expenses
- $128,973
- Assets
- $324,687
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KYLE VANDERBEEK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KYLE VANDERBEEK (PRESIDENT)
- KATIE JORGENSON (SECRETARY)
- JANA DARLING (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide emergency ambulance service
What it reported doing in 2025
Leeds ambulance service is a non-profit bls ambulance service with als capabilities that provides emergency medical services to the leeds, nd community. Leeds ambulance's service area covers approximately 450 square miles to the surrounding leeds area and typically responds to an average of 60-80 emergency calls per year. The leeds ambulance service crew is made up of local volunteer emts, aemts and paramedics along with our cpr/first aid certified drivers who strive to do their best at keeping up with training and education to better serve our community. Leeds ambulance service also tries to educate the community by holding cpr/first aid trainings for local business, as well as hosting safety and awareness events for our local school and community members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.4%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.52; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $123K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.