Ledwith Lewis Free Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204715344
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2014, Form 990-N 2007
- Location
- Tapphannock, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8044439590
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $605,821
- Expenses
- $506,281
- Assets
- $966,917
- Liabilities
- $13,520
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Micheal Faulkner (Executive Director)
- Lisa Andrews (President)
- Spotswood Taliaferro (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Micheal Faulkner (Executive Director): $133,911 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Tappahannock Free Clinic is organized as a community based organization providing quality healthcare to Essex and surrounding counties at little or no charge to low income, uninsured people as well as thosepeople with health insurance but no medication coverage. Tappahannock freeclinic believes that citizens who work at being productive deserve access to adequate medical care, and their goal is to provide this care through the effort of volunteer professionals and support staff, and the contributions of individuals, churches, civic groups, and businesses who share this vision.
What it reported doing in 2024
Women's Wellness Clinic: Provide access to women's health (comprehensive wellness exams, PAP, cancer screening, etc.) twice a month to eligible patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.1%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 79%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.4%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.91; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -41.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.1% of revenue deployed · 79% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $400K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $134K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.