Leavenworth County Fish & Game Development Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237454271
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Leavenworth, KS, USA
Phone
9136825050
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,091
Expenses
$128,350
Assets
$114,818
Liabilities
$4,454

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATHY CATTRELL (President)
  • DAVE CAHOW (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • KATHY CATTRELL (President)
  • DAVE CAHOW (Vice President)
  • AMBER CAHOW (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization was established to provide social and recreational facilities for its members. These facilities include a clubhouse for social events, two large stocked fishing lakes, hunting grounds, and maintained camping facilities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Indoor recreationthe clubhouse contains areas for members and their families to relax and enjoy indoor recreation activities in a safe and comfortable environment. The cluhouse has a complete kitchen and bar facilities with tables both inside and outdoors. Dances with live bands and dj's and other special activities are held on many holidays and other dates during the year for the members and their families. Childrens' activities are provided for the members' children.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Assets have declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.1%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 97.1%; rating input score 97

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.1% of revenue deployed · 97.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $125K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.