Leavenworth City Soccer Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
481168009
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Leavenworth, KS, USA
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$140,785
Expenses
$97,759
Assets
$176,574

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Richard Schilling (President)
  • vacant (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Richard Schilling (President)
  • vacant (Vice President)
  • vacant (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide affordable options for the youth in Leavenworth County to play soccer in a safe and enjoyable environment allowing them to learn and grow through game-like experiences that support individual development rather than win at all costs.Our club is committed to offering an atmosphere where players coaches and referees can grow and give value through community partnership.

What it reported doing in 2024

Academy Soccer Program - low cost $25 for 8 weeks soccer academy provides a bridge between recreational and competitive soccer or for players looking for more touches on the ball. Academy builds individual skills focused on young 5-10 and medium age groups 11-15. Academy also runs our summer camp program two 3-week camps for $25 offered twice per summer in the mornings during work weekdays for 2 hours.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.4%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 99%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.6%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.81; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69.4% of revenue deployed · 99% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $97K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.